Historic Views on Government – Paul Johnson

Honest opinion about government from Paul Johnson:

The disillusion with socialism and other forms of collectivism, which became the dominant spirit of the 1980s, was only one aspect of a much wider loss of faith in the state as an agency of benevolence. The state was, up to the 1980s, the greater gainer of the twentieth century; and the central failure. Before 1914 it was rare for the public sector to embrace more than 10 percent of the economy; by the end of the 1970s, and even beyond, the state took up to 45 percent or more of the GNP in liberal countries, let alone totalitarian ones. But whereas, at the time of the Versailles Treaty in 1919, most intelligent people believed that an enlarged state could increase the sum total of human happiness, by the 1990s this view was held by no one outside a small, diminishing and dispirited band of zealots, most of them academics. The experiment had been tried in innumerable ways; and it had failed in nearly all of them. The state had proved itself an insatiable spender, an unrivalled waster. It had also proved itself the greatest killer of all time. By the 1990s, state action had been responsible for the violent or unnatural deaths of some 125 million people during the century, more perhaps than it had succeed in destroying during the whole of human history up to 1900. Its inhuman malevolence had more than kept pace with its growing size and expanding means.
   Modern Times, 1983, 1991

British historian, journalist, and broadcaster, Paul Johnson was educated at Stonyhurst and Magdalen College, Oxford. He has edited journals, especially the New Statesman, and was professor of communications at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington, D.C. Some of his works include The Offshore Islanders (1972), Elizabeth I: A Study in Power and Intellect (1974), Pope John XXIII (1975), A History of Christianity (1976), Enemies of Society (1977), Modern Times (1983), and Intellectuals (1988).

Quotation and short bio from The Quotable Conservative: The Giants of Conservatism on Liberty, Freedom, Individual Responsibility, and Traditional Values. Rod L. Evans and Irwin M. Berent, editors. Holbrook, Mass.: Adams Publishing, 1996.

Historic Views on Government – Bastiat

Honest opinion about government from Frederic Bastiat:

Whenever a portion of wealth is transferred from the person who owns it–without his consent and without compensation, and whether by force or by fraud–to anyone who does not own it, then I say that property is violated; that an act of plunder is committed.
   I say that this act is exactly what the law is supposed to suppress, always and everywhere. When the law itself commits this act that it is supposed to suppress, I say that plunder is still committed, and I add that from the point of view of society and welfare, this aggression against rights is even worse.

Try to imagine a regulation of labor imposed by force that is not a violation of liberty; a transfer of wealth imposed by force that is not a violation of property. If you cannot reconcile these contradictions, then you must conclude that the law cannot organize labor and industry without organizing injustice.
   The Law, 1850

A French economist, statesman, and author, Frederic Bastiat was a firm believer in free enterprise and an opponent of socialism. Near the end of his life, he criticized the socialistic direction in which France was headed. A believer in private charity but not in the forced redistribution of wealth, Bastiat held that socialism violates property rights and leads to conflict and economic stagnation as the ratio of producers to consumers narrows.

Quotation and short bio from The Quotable Conservative: The Giants of Conservatism on Liberty, Freedom, Individual Responsibility, and Traditional Values. Rod L. Evans and Irwin M. Berent, editors. Holbrook, Mass.: Adams Publishing, 1996.