|
Three books always come up on "must read" lists for aspiring
screenwriters. They are Aristotle's POETICS, Lajos Egri's THE ART OF DRAMATIC WRITING
(1946), and William Goldman's ADVENTURES IN THE SCREEN TRADE.
Quite a prestigious group for Mr. Goldman to be included in?
Not at all! With award-winning scripts such as BUTCH CASSIDY AND THE SUNDANCE KID, ALL THE
PRESIDENT'S MEN, THE PRINCESS BRIDE (adapted from his own work), and MISERY among others
under his belt, it can be argued that his efforts are true screenwriting gold.
In the aforementioned book, he shares his experiences with the
various aspects of Hollywood. His invaluable insights, though written in 1982, still hold
pertinence as we head into the next century.
Starting off with his humble beginnings as a New York writer
and editor, Goldman explains how a chance writing assignment for Cliff Robertson started him
on the road to his first Hollywood film, HARPER. The chapter about writing this Paul
Newman-header should be mandatory reading for all film students, as it explains why movies
are a visual medium and the importance of character definition. This is achieved through an
entertaining, not preaching form, which is characteristic of all 585 pages of ADVENTURES.
When others have found cracking this book daunting, I've had
them read just the HARPER section. In every case, it's lead them to read the rest of the
book.
Goldman also relates the merits and minuses of agents,
directors and actors among other industry professionals. This clears up a lot of confusion
about how the Hollywood machine works, and why codependence is necessary while not logical.
Example: producer's reliance on stars will never change. To quote, "the knowledge of their
eventual decapitation is central to the life of a studio executive." So, without any true
creativity under their belts, they turn to the only money-making constant in their god's
celestial heaven: top actors. Once established, performers may have some down years. Betting
on their getting back on top is one of the more sure gambles studio personnel can eventually
bank on. And thus a name attached to a project will move it towards lensing.
Through observations, the author also proves himself accurate
with a few predictions. Without a crystal ball, Goldman notes how "by the end of the
eighties,... we'll be looking back on the good old days... when HEAVEN'S GATE was a
cheapie." For younger people, compare this to the hundred-and-forty million flop WILD WILD
WEST.
In discussing movie maker's "ecology," he more than hints at
the ever-growing number of "comic book" films. These are defined as predictable formula
concepts that sacrifice richer stories for spectacle elements. He quotes a studio head as
saying that out of sixteen projects okayed, "the last three I have hope for." These were the
scripts that dared going beyond good guys winning and bad guys getting theirs; that took
deeper looks at the condition of humanity. Goldman goes on by saying, "Those "last three"
aren't being made anymore." And that's been the case - till just recently.
He mentions that executives will say they'll shift back to
serious endeavors "when the public demands it." John Q Public seems to be speaking.
With the success of low-budget and independent works like
AMERICAN BEAUTY, BEING JOHN MALKOVICH and, arguable either way, SIXTH SENSE
(recently ignored by the National Board of Review since it made money), a shift is at hand.
There will always be well-met comic book movies like ET, that reaches a little deeper into
our emotions, and Blair witches that scare us with a simple "what if." But we need Bette
Davis to warn us of her up-and-coming bumpy night, and then to watch her learn to ride it
since the problems entailed with aging will never go away. And we need Shakespeare to let
his heroes win the girl even though he doesn't, and create heroines in an age where women
weren't allowed on the stage.
Readers won't agree with everything William Goldman has to
say, and a few future predictions were way off mark. His description of PSYCHO's ending as
being a let down, with five of seven minutes taken up with a shrink delivering Freud may be
right, though I don't remember that. I do remember Norman's mother self speaking in his mind
as a voice-over. This and the exposition at end added to the creepy feeling I was left with,
and created the thought that even the seemingly normal boy next door could come over and
knife me in the shower.
He also mentions that the studios thought HBO would save them
with purchasing films and financing pictures. He does disclaim, "I have no idea as to its
eventual accuracy." Reality: HBO went straight to production companies and gouged studios in
purchase agreements thanks to their own show of desperation. In 1982, he didn't discuss the
rising video arena. Funny how the studios thought video would be their final death and it
became their savior, increasing interest in movies as worth-while entertainment.
Goldman's summary is straight-forward: money doesn't make a
movie; talent does. 1999 is proving him right. I'm happy to report that he has a follow-up
to ADVENTURES coming out from Pantheon Books in March of 2000. It's aptly titled WHICH LIE
DID I TELL?, OR MORE ADVENTURES IN THE SCREEN TRADE. My bet is readers should check out this
first installment before venturing into the continuing saga, which should prove another
mandatory text.
William Goldman is also following up on a past successful
collaboration with director Rob Reiner. He's adapting Stephen King's HEARTS IN ATLANTIS for
him. In an industry where ageism is a constant fear, Mr. Goldman's writing talent won't be
tarnished from lack of use anytime soon.
Mary Gilbert-Bray is a column journalist who had an editor give her a Christmas
gift of a screenplay format book with the inscription, "You're a good storyteller; you
should try this." Besides currently attempting spec scripts, she's turning an eight article
series into The Hunting Widow's Guidebook (humor), has two nonfiction works due later this
year on AD/HD and its effect on families and history, and will have a short story, Unbroken
Hearts, in a fall issue of ATTENTION! Magazine.
|